I have come to find that there are a plethora of paradoxes in
my line of work. If not paradoxes, they
are at least self-contradictions or oxymoronical. It seems that every struggle for progress in
natural resources is pushing against inherent self-supporting forces or
values. One of the areas that my
department manages is the Granite Chief Wilderness area and the management of Wilderness
is a prime example of contradiction in my work.
Last week,
my boss sent the trails intern and myself to the Region 5 Pacific Southwest
Wilderness Ranger Academy. The Wilderness
Ranger academy is essentially the conference at the beginning of the season for
Forest Service employees who work in the wilderness areas of California. If you don’t work for the Forest Service and
do not spend too much time on Forest Service land you probably do not know what
I am talking about when I say Wilderness.
Don’t take it personally, I didn’t know what it really meant until I
started working here either.
The
Wilderness Act was passed by Congress in 1964 and many American outdoorsmen (and
women) consider it to be one of the most poetic and environmentally savvy
pieces of legislation to come down from Capitol Hill. If there ever was a Hippie congress, this may
have been it. The funny thing is, the
environment didn’t used be a partisan issue…but I digress. The purpose of the Wilderness Act was to
create designated areas “to assure that an increasing population, accompanied
by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify
all areas within the United States…leaving no lands designated for the
preservation and protection in their natural condition…” (Wilderness Act,
1964). Pretty powerful and controversial
language, right? Congress actually
passed this with only one dissenting vote!
But here is where it gets really good:
Section
C: A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his own works
dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and its
community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who
does not remain. An area of primeval
character and influence, without permanent improvements or human
habitation…[and] to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with
the imprint of man’s work substantially unnoticeable…[and] has outstanding opportunities
for solitude…
-Wilderness
Act of 1964
Doesn’t it
sound like the Land Before Time or something out of a Jules Verne novel? How many places of “primeval character” have
you been to in the United States? When
the Wilderness Act passed, 9.1 million acres were set-aside in 13 states. Today over 109 million acres are now part of
the Wilderness system in America. Every
year, thousands of acres are added to the system. There seems to be a little competition or at
least feigned snobbery between the National Park Service and the Forest
Service. So, in keeping loyalty to the
home team, it pains me to say that the National Park Service manages the most
acreage of Wilderness. It is, however, a
slight panacea to say that the Forest Service manages the most Wilderness
areas.
The idea of
wilderness is an integral facet of the idea of America. The history of America was formed on the
backbone of people daring to go into the unknown and uninhabited (or so they
thought). There is something about the
word wilderness that sends shivers down my spine. Go ahead and try it: think of an area, wild,
full of rushing streams, twittering songbirds, dramatic boulders and
bluffs. Groves of trees reaching for the
sun with canopies casting deep shadows to the soft underbrush. Have you ever been somewhere that has no
quick rescue if things turn pear-shaped?
There is an excitement of knowing that you are on your own, an
apprehensive willingness to test your own skills and resolve. There is a comfort as well; the ability to
trust yourself in any situation is one of the best gifts that the wilderness
can give you.
The
Wilderness Academy was held in the town of Lee Vining, which is located on the
eastern side of the Sierra Nevada Mountains and 10 miles from the east entrance
to Yosemite National Park. The town also
sits adjacent to Mono Lake, which is a massive alkali salt-water body that is
known to host the majority of seagull rookeries in California. I heard a statistic that claimed that 90% of
all seagulls in California were born at Mono Lake. While seagulls are not my favorite winged
beasts, it is an interesting fact, at least.
The area leading to our campground was in a valley surrounded by the ridged
mountains leading into Yosemite. If you
haven’t been to the area let me give you a sense of the mountains with one
word: intimidating. The granite fists
seem to thrust straight up towards the sky, the stony knuckles snow-capped and
the veins pumping with rock talus. Storm
clouds and rain darkened the peaks and ridges.
It was a striking backdrop to our streamside campsite, to be sure.
Our
campsite was located directly adjacent to Lee Vining creek, a stream no more
than 15 feet across, with schools of Rainbow Trout swimming through the crystal
clear snow melt. I really wish I had
brought my fly fishing rod, because all I would have had to do is drop the line
by hand to catch a fish. The stream,
rushing and swirling through the rocks sounds like a rock concert if you are
trying to sleep next to it. But somehow,
the drumbeat of water on rock fades into thoughts about the day and in
conjunction with a warm sleeping bag, sleep befalls you faster than the strike
of a trout on a mayfly.
I think
Aspens (Populus tremuloides) are my
new favorite trees. I spotted a group of
them in my camp. With the pale bark of a
birch or alder, the Aspen is unassuming: not reaching any height of
dominance. Often, Aspens grow in
clusters or groves due to their amazing ability to clone itself simply by root
propagation. There is a colony of Aspens
in Utah that is estimated to weigh over 80,000 kilograms and be over 80,000
years old. Aspens also provide an area
with habitat diversity since many small mammals and birds are absent where
Aspens are not present. The thing that I
love the most about Aspens is the leaf.
Individually, the leaves are heart-shaped and generally no larger than 1
1/2 “ across. The petioles of the leaves
are flexible and flattened, which allows them to turn nearly 270°
without consequence. The branches hang
hundreds of leaves that the wind flashes back and forth. The leaves show both sides, as if they were
spouses displaying a new dress. The
thousands of fluttering, excited leaves create the illusion of the tree dancing
spiritedly to no particular tune except the soft breeze. I can only imagine what symphony to which I
am deaf that the trees are receptive to.
The Ponderosa Pine (Pinus
ponderosa) are the wallflowers of this concert, mildly observing the
frolicking Aspen groves like the way men are oft to look on with appreciative
longing at groups of pretty girls on a dance floor.
The main reason that my boss sent
us down to the Wilderness Academy was for one of the two-day certification
sessions. The session that we signed up
for was to receive a certification to buck logs with a crosscut saw. What this means to laypeople is that I will
be able to cut up fallen logs with one of the vintage saws that you always see
in old logging photos. If you don’t know
what I am talking about I highly suggest you click here and look at the photos
at the bottom: http://www.whatcommuseum.org/photo-archives/category/1-darius-kinsey
Crosscut saws are still used today because of the tenets of the Wilderness
Act. The Act prohibits the use of
mechanized machinery within the boundaries, which means no chain saws. The trails in the wilderness still need to be
cleared of fallen logs, and so the trail crews (us) have to cut them out some
way. Unfortunately, crosscut saws are
not widely produced anymore. The steel is
different and the molds for the vintage saws no longer exist. This means that the vintage saws from the
late 1800’s and early 1900’s are invaluable and irreplaceable. I feel like a turn of the century logger when
I work with these saws, and I really wish that I could grow a proper moustache
or beard. It is amazing how sharp and
efficient these saws are. With a two man
bucking saw, it is possible to cut through a 40” diameter log in minutes. Apparently, in New Zealand and Australia
there are forestry competitions that feature sawyers capable of beating
chainsaws with crosscuts. I cut out my
first log with a crosscut and felt like the sawyers of old.
The area that we were working in
was near Mammoth Mountain. A wind event
in December had clocked speeds of over 180 mph, and then the wind gauge broke
from strain. The event purportedly
brought down 20,000 trees in the forest and the valley we were doing our
training in was ground zero. The area
looked like a war zone: snags and green
trees alike crisscrossed the trails like pick up sticks and root balls turned
up so much of the earth that finding a way through the area was maze-like. We had about 7 different groups with tools
and a saw each. After 4 hours of work
the lot of us had only managed to clear about 50 yards of trail, and it still
needed hours more work to bring it back to Forest Service trail
specifications. For a point of
reference, we usually can clear and maintain about 5 10 miles of trail in a
day, so 50 yards is ridiculously slow going.
Back at the main academy we
listened to a speaker that posed some interesting ideas about Wilderness in
America and the modern world. Take a
moment to scroll back up and refresh yourself with the sections of the
Wilderness Act. OK, still sounds pretty
poetic right? Well, it most definitely
is more John Muir than John Adams for a Congressionally passed bill. However, as with all legislation that is
based on ideals, the follow through of the Act has complications that are
contrary to the philosophies upon which it is founded. And more I think about it, the wilderness
ideal isn’t really an ideology, more a theology. People revere and are protective of nature as
a solemn and wild entity. Ay, there’s
the rub: if nature is an entity, protecting it with laws requires defining
it.
The Wilderness Act prohibits some
actions, such as using mechanized machinery or flying aircraft low over the
boundaries. It also encourages other
actions, such as the Leave no Trace guidelines.
The bureaucracy of Wilderness requires a definition of what Wilderness is. By defining something that, in essence, is
supposed to be wild and indefinable, you limit its potentiality. For example, the Wilderness Act contains the
description of areas to be “untrammeled”.
Well, by definition, untrammeled means a no restrictions or impediments
to freedom. By including that language
in the Act and by managing and controlling the uses of Wilderness Areas you are,
in a certain perspective, violating the Act itself. A cyclic system can be observed when a
natural area is managed: a disagreement leads to a case being sent to court,
which prompts a ruling that leads to a new laws or regulations. These regulations are, of course, constantly
in under scrutiny or public criticism, which leads to more conflict, and that
starts the cycle again. The more that
wild areas are defined, the more these areas will lose their wild
character. Some even argue that the
professionalization and management of the Wilderness can or has led to a
homogenization of the diversity of the Wilderness areas.
The counterargument to this view point is this: what do you
think the National Parks and Wilderness areas would be like without the laws in
place? As much as you can criticize the
agencies that manage public lands, America would be a very different nation
without the people who have dedicated their lives to making sure every citizen
has lands and wilderness to discover for themselves. That
mindset brings me back to the abbreviated mission statement of the Forest
Service: “Caring for the land and serving people”.
The way that I like to think of the Wilderness topic is the
same way that Winston Churchill described democracy:
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except all those other forms that have been tried
from time to time.
I have worked a few outreach events
that allowed me to interact with the public and hear what they have to say
about the Forest Service and sometimes to my consternation, the federal
government as well. There tends to be
only polarized opinions: most of the public is very happy with the work that we
(Forest Service) do and the results that we achieve. But, there are always those other people that
think that every branch of the federal government and swollen and filled with
lazy people. To those opinions, I
usually keep my smile on, nod vigorously and sit back in my chair and
listen. While I would love to fulfill
all of their dreams of what the government should be (usually filled with
things unattainable on the level of free ice cream for everyone every Friday),
you cant always please everyone all the time.
What we can, and have been doing for over 100 years, is provide
unabashed outdoor experiences for those brave enough to challenge
themselves. And what do you receive as
ample reward? The personal discovery of
things made by nature and the appreciation of the interconnected world that
supports you. So the next time you have
a free weekend this summer, instead of succumbing to the draw of the television
or computer (like the one you are on now), go discover your local wild places. Sit by a stream, eat lunch in a meadow, hug a
tree, hang your feet over a ridge. You
may discover something about yourself as well. Or not. But it’s your call.
By very definition this wilderness is a need. The idea of wilderness
as an area without man's influence is man's own concept. Its values are
human values. Its preservation is a purpose that arises out of man's
own sense of his fundamental needs.
-Howard Zahniser, The Need for Wilderness Areas